论文部分内容阅读
目的 :研究探讨产妇采用水中分娩的方法的产程活跃期时间以及分娩过程中的疼痛级别,以此作为水中分娩的临床效果及其安全性的评价依据。方法 :选择80例本院于2014年6月至2015年12月的产妇作为研究对象,其中水中分娩的观察组有25名产妇,自然分娩的对照组有55名产妇。在分娩过程中记录下80名产妇的产程活跃期时间与分娩疼痛级别等数据。结果 :经过统计学处理,观察组产妇的产程活跃期时间明显低于对照组产妇的产程活跃时间,两组比较差异具有统计学意义;观察组产妇的疼痛级别总的来说比对照组产妇的疼痛级别要低,且观察组的产妇没有一例在行术中采取了药物镇痛,但比较组则有75%以上的产妇需要药物镇痛,两组比较差异具有统计学意义。结论 :水中分娩能够大大缩短产妇的产程活跃期时间,产妇水中分娩过程中的疼痛也能得到减轻,本项研究无一例出现母亲、新生儿不良结局,水中分娩值得推广。
OBJECTIVE: To study the active stage of labor and the pain level during delivery in maternal water delivery as the basis for clinical evaluation of water delivery and its safety. Methods: A total of 80 maternal women from June 2014 to December 2015 in our hospital were selected. Among them, 25 maternal women in observation group in water delivery and 55 maternal women in natural delivery group. In the course of childbirth recorded 80 maternal labor duration of labor and labor pain level and other data. Results: After statistical analysis, the active period of labor in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant; the pain level of observation group was higher than that of control group The level of pain was low, and none of the women in the observation group took drug analgesia during operation. However, more than 75% of the women in the comparison group needed drug analgesia. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Childbirth in water can shorten the active period of labor and the pain during delivery in maternal water can be reduced. None of the cases in this study have adverse effects on mothers and newborns, and the water birth should be promoted.