高血压药物时间治疗学的临床应用

来源 :中国实用医药 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:lggu770621
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的观察高血压患者血压昼夜节律及高血压药物时间治疗的血压控制情况并分析影响因素。方法收集近3年住院高血压患者200例,根据动态血压监测结果将血压昼夜节律分为杓型、非杓型、反杓型及超杓型,按类型进行时间给药,随访2个月进行分析。结果入选患者中,正常血压节律87例,占43.5%;异常血压节律113例,占56.5%,其中非杓型占34.5%,反杓型占20%,超杓型占2%,中青年以正常血压节律为主,老年人以异常血压节律居多,治疗2个月,血压达标率72.5%,有71.68%的异常血压节律转为正常血压节律。结论高血压患者应重视血压节律的检测,强化高血压药物的时间治疗学。 Objective To observe the circadian rhythm of blood pressure and the control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension treated with time and analyze the influencing factors. Methods 200 cases of hospitalized patients with hypertension were collected in the recent 3 years. According to the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, the circadian rhythm of blood pressure was divided into dipper, non-dipper, anti-dipper and super dipper. The rats were dosed by type and were followed up for 2 months analysis. Results Of the patients enrolled, 87 cases were normal blood pressure rhythm, accounting for 43.5%; 113 cases were abnormal blood pressure rhythm, accounting for 56.5%, of which non-dipper accounted for 34.5%, anti-dipper accounted for 20% and super-dipper accounted for 2% Normal blood pressure rhythm, the elderly with abnormal blood pressure rhythm most of the treatment for 2 months, blood pressure compliance rate of 72.5%, 71.68% of abnormal blood pressure rhythm switch to normal blood pressure rhythm. Conclusion Hypertensive patients should pay attention to the detection of blood pressure rhythm and strengthen the time therapy of hypertension drugs.
其他文献
期刊
期刊
期刊
目的 探讨经股动脉治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成并下腔静脉滤器植入术后股动脉出血的相关因素及护理.方法 分析12例重度股动脉出血患者自身具有的出血危险因素、发生出血的原因、
期刊
Objective To review the senescent remodeling of the immune system with aging and its relevance to the increased susceptibility of the elderly to infectious dis
本文详细介绍了如何把uC/OSII嵌入式操作系统移植到S1C33L11微处理器的方法,并简要介绍了基于S1C33L11的uC/OSII嵌入式应用程序的编程。 This article details how to port
期刊
期刊
目的探讨采用内侧撑开技术辅助下的切开复位内固定术治疗跟骨关节内骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年9月至2013年11月采用切开复位内固定治疗的151例跟骨关节内骨折患者资料,男95例,女56例;年龄18~69岁;骨折按照Sanders分型:Ⅱ型24例,Ⅲ型76例,Ⅳ型51例。根据有无使用撑开器分为撑开组(27例)和无撑开组(124例),两组患者术前一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05