论文部分内容阅读
臧克家同志的《纳谏与止谤》的论证艺术是很高超的。开篇,作者连用两个比喻,从读《邹忌讽齐王纳谏》入手,交代本文要议论的范围,起到了与文题相应的作用。接着指出自以为“天之子”的帝王,“能倾听逆耳之言,采纳美芹之献的,历史上并不多见”,然后笔锋一转,从正面着笔,抓住齐威王“从谏如流”来立论:纳谏,使政治稳定,国泰民安。这样,先反后正,既有提出论题的坚实基础,又不使人感到突然,收到了相得益彰的效果。
Comrade Kelki’s “arguing and stopping the battle” is very highly articulated. In the opening chapter, the author used two metaphors, starting with reading “Zou Ji, satirizing Qi Wang Nao”, to explain the scope of this article, and played a corresponding role with the article. Then he pointed out that the emperors who thought they were “children of heaven,” “You can listen to the words of your ears and adopt the offerings of Mei-qin, and you don’t see much in history.” Then the pen strokes, and he pens from the front and grasps the king of Qiwei. Such as the flow of "argument: Nathan, so that political stability, the country and Thailand public security. In this way, first and foremost, there is a solid foundation for the thesis, and it does not make people feel suddenly, and they have received the effect of complementing each other.