据我所見所聞,目前在古典文学教学中有这样一些混乱現象。有的教师主張着重講解語句,以为学生开始学習古典文学,一定要注意语言的訓練,等有了相当基础再来分析思想內容。这样,無形中就恢复了过去私学館老先生講經的办法。有的以为学生学習古典文学主要是認識古代社会,了解生活,不需要理解古代语言,于是就把所有的精力都放在思想內容的分析上,使那些优美的作品变成枯燥無味的东西。有的偏重于作家、作品和文学史知識的介紹,忽略課文的講解和分析。由于教材分量重,在精簡課文以后,对于課时分配沒有作明确的規定,文学教师就“各自为政”,往往从兴趣出發,把自己喜爱的和有材料可講的課文,就 As far as I can tell, there is such confusion in classical literature teaching. Some teachers advocate focusing on sentences, that students begin to learn classical literature, we must pay attention to language training, so have a fairly basic analysis of the contents of the thought. In this way, virtually restored to the past, private school teacher Mr. Sutra approach. Some think that students should learn classical literature mainly to understand ancient society, to understand life, do not need to understand ancient languages, so they put all their energies on the analysis of the content of thought, so beautiful works become dull things. Some emphasis on the author, works and literary history of the introduction of knowledge, ignoring the text to explain and analysis. Due to the weight of teaching materials, after the streamlining of texts, there is no explicit stipulation on the distribution of time. Literary teachers, on the basis of their own interests, often start from their interests and put their favorite texts on materials