论文部分内容阅读
在案件事实争议涉及专业知识时,当事人自己聘请“友好专家证人”提供专业意见和举证,法院支持当事人对“友好专家证人”在作证过程中的职业过失索赔,这已成为英美等国司法实践的发展趋势。佩斯诉斯瓦尔德洛(Pace v.Swerdlow)案展现法官论证“友好专家证人”承担责任应证明存在直接因果关系要件的思维过程,揭示实现法律政策的路径,即通过对“友好专家证人”民事责任构成要件的选择与证明标准的考量,可以在“鼓励友好专家证人帮助当事人举证”与“要求友好专家证人独立尽职作证”之间达致平衡。
In the case of factual controversy involving professional knowledge, the parties themselves hired “expert expert witness ” to provide professional advice and evidence, the court supports the parties to “friendly expert witness ” in the process of testifying career loss claims, which has become Anglo-American et al National judicial practice of the development trend. The Pace v. Swerdlow case shows the judge’s argument that “friendly expert witness ” assumes responsibility for the process of thinking that should prove the existence of direct causal elements, revealing the path to legal policy, that is, by “friendly expert Witness ”The consideration of the elements of civil liability and the criteria for the certification can strike a balance between “ Encouraging friendly expert witnesses to assist the parties in proving ”and “ requiring friendly expert witnesses to perform due diligence ”.