论文部分内容阅读
罗莎·卢森堡在《资本积累论》中联系帝国主义经济现象,对马克思未发表的《资本论》第二卷手稿进行了文献学的阅读,在此基础上建构了以货币需求为主题、以资本主义与非资本主义相互依存关系为基本结构的资本积累图式。1924年,布哈林出版了《帝国主义与资本积累》一书,对罗莎·卢森堡的资本积累图式进行了系统地批评。布哈林的批评虽然没有驳倒罗莎·卢森堡,却提出了《资本论》阅读中的一个重要的方法论问题:是用同一性的思维方式去阅读,把《资本论》各卷的问题视为同一的,还是用差异性的方法阅读,揭示《资本论》各卷次问题的不同?是用《资本论》第一卷的公式来解答《资本论》各卷的问题,还是从《资本论》第二卷或第三卷的视角切入《资本论》各卷的问题?这些问题是从人类历史和思想史的变革中生发出来的,因而只有在思想史的语境中、在文本与现实的张力中,才能做出科学而正确的解答。
Rosa Luxemburg, in the “Theory of Capital Accumulation”, linked imperialist economic phenomena to a reading of the philology of the unpublished second volume of Marx’s Capital Theory. On the basis of this, Capitalism and non-capitalist interdependence as the basic structure of the capital accumulation pattern. In 1924, Bukharin published the book “The Accumulation of Imperialism and Capital,” systematically criticizing Rosa Luxemburg’s capital accumulation scheme. Although Bukharin’s criticism did not refute Rosa Luxemburg, he proposed an important methodological issue in his reading of Capital: reading with the same way of thinking and treating the problems of the capitalist volume as The same or different ways to read, reveal the “Capital” of the different issues in different volumes? Is the “Capital” of the first volume of the formula to answer the “capital” of the volume of the problem, or from the “capital” “The second or third volumes of the perspective cut into the” capital "of the volume issues? These issues are from the human history and the evolution of the thought of the germinal, and thus only in the context of the history of ideas in the text and reality Tension in order to make a scientific and correct answer.