论文部分内容阅读
20世纪 90年代曹顺庆等学者提出的当代中国文论的“失语症”及重建中国文论话语命题 ,在学术界引起强烈反响。赞成的、反对的和商榷的意见都不少 ,但更多的则希望他们提出具体的切实可行的思路、方法和拿出实际成果。现在他们提出“汉语批评”策略 ,既是对学界期待作出回应 ,又使其以前的学术理论更加深入。本刊选发的这组笔谈 ,集中探讨了汉语批评的理论内涵、话语策略、汉语批评与当代全球化语境等问题 ,表明了他们重建中国文论话语的基本和具体的方法及路径 ,希望引起读者关注。
The “aphasia” of contemporary Chinese literary theory proposed by scholars such as Cao Shunqing in the 1990s and reconstruction of the discourse proposition of Chinese literary theory have aroused strong repercussions in academia. There are many favorable, opposed and negotiated opinions, but more often they hope they can come up with concrete and practical ideas, methods and practical results. Now they put forward the strategy of “Chinese criticism”, which not only responds to the expectations of academics but also deepens their previous academic theories. The series of written anthologies published in this issue focus on the theoretical connotation of Chinese criticism, discourse strategies, Chinese criticism and the context of contemporary globalization, and demonstrate the basic and concrete methods and paths for their reconstruction of Chinese literary discourse. They hope Readers attention.