通过对德日、法、美、英等国临时性救济程序的研究,认为临时性救济分两个功能层次,第二层次突破了传统临时性救济的“附属性”特征,具有确保现在利益与暂时实现权利的功能、证据保全功能、纠纷解决功能得以实现的作用。程序设置上的“两造对立辩论或陈述意见”确保上述功能的实现,这样裁定具有既判力效力。 Through the research on the temporary relief procedures in Germany, Japan, France, the United States and Britain, it is considered that the temporary relief has two functional levels and the second level has broken through the “subsidiary ” characteristics of the traditional temporary relief, Interests and functions of temporarily realizing rights, evidence preservation functions and dispute resolution functions. Program settings on the “two opposing controversy or statement of opinion ” to ensure the realization of the above functions, so ruled that the res judicata has the effect.