论文部分内容阅读
自古史官记事修志,掌褒贬之权,其地位和职能十分重要,故历代王朝“无不建官分职,克慎其选”。数千年来,文史官员不避权贵、秉笔直书、善恶不隐的浩然正气,被视为史学之魂魄和史学传统中最可宝贵的精神财富。历代史职人员所向往的这种治史的相对独立性,被称之为“史权”。在君主家天下的专制时代,史权虽然不可能摆脱皇权的制约,但是史权的传统观念多多少少为治史者提供了一点客观的保证,一定程度上维护了古代历史记录的连续性和真实性。
Since ancient times, the history of the historian records Chi, palm criticism of the right, its status and function is very important, so the dynasties dynasties “all build official separation, cautious.” For thousands of years, cultural and historical officials have not escaped their dominance, upholding straight books and upholding righteousness and evilness are regarded as the most precious spiritual wealth in the soul of historiography and in the tradition of history. The relative independence of such a history as longing for historical personnel is called “historical rights.” Although it is impossible for the historical rights to get rid of the imperial power in the monarchy world, the traditional concepts of the historical rights provide more or less an objective guarantee for the historians and maintain the continuity of ancient historical records to a certain extent Authenticity.