论文部分内容阅读
针对城市规划管理中经常面临要求日照时间大于国家最低标准的要求,以及保证眺望权等问题,本文根据《物权法》,分析了阳光权与眺望权在物权法定原则下的异同,指出阳光权与眺望权分别属于所有权与用益物权的范畴:作为相邻权的阳光权,是规划管理必须满足的法定义务;而眺望权以及高于国家最低标准的日照要求,则不属于相邻权的范畴,而是属于地役权的范畴,规划部门在规划管理中要特别注意把它们和阳光权区分开来,在对规划方案审批中,不能轻易满足开发商或城市居民眺望权或高标准的日照要求,否则可能构成对相邻地块地役权的侵犯。
According to the “Real Right Law”, this paper analyzes the similarities and differences between sunshine right and overlooking right under the legal principle of real right, points out the sunshine right and overlooking Rights belong to the category of ownership and usufructuary rights respectively. As the sunshine right of the neighboring rights, it is a statutory obligation that must be met by the planning and management. However, overlooking the right of sunshine and sunshine requirements higher than the national minimum standards are not within the scope of neighboring rights, But belongs to the scope of easement. The planning department should pay special attention to the separation of the sunshine rights in the planning and management. When approving the planning proposal, the planning department can not easily meet the requirements of the developer or the urban residents to view the right or a high standard of sunshine , Otherwise it may constitute a violation of the easement of the adjacent plots.