当我们投下一张选票时,我们对最终决策究竟有多大影响?我们真的能改善公共政策吗?在过去的几百年中,人类一直在思考这个问题,甚至经济学家们也掺和了进来,于是就有了公共选择理论。毫无疑问,一张选票于事无补,结果必然是“理性的无知”:表面上看,每个人都投票,可以表达自己的想法,程序很清晰,可结果却很可能是违反理性的。典型的例证是希特勒靠票选窃取大权,“二战”时期,军国主义的日本也依然有总统选举。当然,我们可以说 How much impact do we have on the final decision when we vote for a ballot and can we really improve public policy? For the last few hundred years, mankind has been thinking about it, and even economists have blended Come in, so there is a theory of public choice. There is no doubt that a ballot paper does not help, the result must be “rational ignorance ”: On the surface, everyone votes to express their own ideas, the procedure is very clear, the result is likely to be contrary to reason . A typical example is Hitler’s election by stepping over his votes. During World War II, militarist Japan still had presidential elections. Of course, we can say that