论文部分内容阅读
据笔者词查,群众打“110”报案,公安机关赶赴现场进行现场勘查、询问被害人、调查走访等均是在没有立案的情况下进行的,特别是在现场抓获犯罪嫌疑人后没有办理任何法律手续就将犯罪嫌疑人带至公安机关进行审查,然后再补办刑事立案和传唤等相关手续。执法实践也表明,由于公安机关接到报警后几分钟内必须赶到现场以及现场情况不明、现行犯或重大嫌疑分子身份不清等原因,要求警察必须在立案以后才采取侦查行为是不切实际的。那么,公安机关人民警察这种在立案前进行的侦查行为是否合法、其收集、固定的证据是否有法律效力?
According to the author's words, the masses hit the “110” report, the public security organs rushed to the scene for site investigation, interrogation of victims, investigation visits were carried out without filing the case, especially after the scene captured the suspects did not handle any law The procedure will take the suspect to the public security organ for review, and then re-submit the criminal case and summon and other related procedures. The law enforcement practice also shows that it is unrealistic to require the police to take investigation after the case has been filed because the police must arrive at the scene within a few minutes after receiving the alarm and the scene is unclear and the status of current or major suspects is unclear . So, the public security organs of the People's Police such investigation carried out prior to the filing is legal, the collection of fixed evidence is legally binding?