论文部分内容阅读
目的了解辖区内不同类型宾馆客房卫生、公共用具的卫生状况及存在问题。方法选择辖区内大、中、小型宾馆21家,对宾馆客房空气质量(细菌总数、CO2、CO、甲醛、可吸入颗粒物)、照明及温湿度、噪声、风速等进行检测;随机抽取公用物品(茶杯、口杯、漱口杯、毛巾、被单、床单等)进行细菌总数、大肠菌群等检测。结果在21家宾馆中,大、中、小型宾馆室内空气质量的合格率分别为92.00%、83.33%、63.00%,公用物品的合格率分别为88.42%、77.29%、61.89%,大中型宾馆客房的空气质量及公用物品的合格率优于小型宾馆。结论临淄区大、中、小型宾馆卫生指标检测的合格率参差不一,中型以上及大型宾馆,空气质量、公共用品合格率较高,建议继续加强对各类宾馆的监督检测,尤其对小型宾馆的卫生管理应引起足够的重视。
Objective To understand the hygienic conditions and existing problems of different types of hotel rooms in the area and public appliances. Methods 21 large, medium and small hotels in the area were selected to test the air quality (total number of bacteria, CO2, CO, formaldehyde and respirable particulate matter), lighting, temperature, humidity, noise and wind speed in hotel rooms. Cups, beakers, beakers, towels, sheets, sheets, etc.) for the total number of bacteria, coliforms and other tests. Results Among 21 hotels, the passing rates of indoor air quality of large, medium and small hotels were 92.00%, 83.33% and 63.00% respectively, and the passing rates of public goods were 88.42%, 77.29% and 61.89% respectively. Large and medium-sized hotel rooms The air quality and public goods pass rate is better than small hotels. Conclusions The passing rates of hygiene indexes of large, medium and small hotels in Linzi District are different. The passing rates of medium and above hotels and large hotels are higher, and the qualified rate of air quality and public goods is higher. It is suggested to continue to strengthen the supervision and inspection of various hotels, especially for small hotels Health management should attract enough attention.