论文部分内容阅读
2004年3月26日,河北省高级人民法院二审对四名被告人作出死缓判决后,本刊记者再次采访了陈瑞华教授,他作出如下评价:这一案件不仅在定罪的理由上存在明显的问题,而且在诉讼程序上有大量的违法情况。可以说,这是继“杜培武案件”以来最为典型的违反诉讼程序的案件。结合案件具体情况,陈教授对记者分析说:首先,此案在定罪依据的充分性上存在明显的问题,严重违背了无罪推定原则的基本要求。这是因为,河北
On March 26, 2004, after Hebei Higher People’s Court of second instance made a death sentence for the four defendants, the reporter again interviewed Professor Chen Ruihua and made the following assessment: This case not only has obvious problems on the grounds of conviction , But also a large number of violations in the proceedings. It can be said that this is the most typical case of violation of the procedure since the case of Du Pei Wu. Combined with the specific circumstances of the case, Professor Chen analyzed to reporters: First, there are obvious problems in the adequacy of the conviction basis and a serious violation of the basic requirements of the principle of presumption of innocence. This is because, Hebei