论文部分内容阅读
[目的]探讨冠心病血脂干预技术培训效果及影响因素。[方法]通过培训前后专业技能测试和问卷调查,比较培训前后专业技能水平及培训满意度,从教与学两个方面进行评价,并对相关因素进行非条件Logistic回归分析。[结果]通过培训,学员的专业技能平均得分从64.58分提高到85.71分,培训前后的专业技能得分差异有统计学意义(t=12.956~23.076,P﹤0.01)。培训后在县级单位工作、学历高、职称高、取得执业医师资格、从事西医治疗工作人员专业技能的提高程度高于其他人群(F=2.956~7.546,P﹤0.05);同时,90%以上的学员对培训效果感到满意。培训效果的影响因素主要有:工作单位(OR=2.129,95%CI=1.527~2.969)、文化程度(OR=2.607,95%CI=2.222~3.064)、技术职称(OR=2.525,95%CI=1.839~3.468)、从事业务(OR=3.182,95%CI=1.458~6.942)和执业类别(OR=0.316,95%CI=0.163~0.615)等。[结论]培训取得了较好的效果,该培训模式和方法适宜在农村扩大推广和应用。
[Objective] To investigate the training effect and influencing factors of coronary heart disease lipids intervention. [Methods] The professional skills test and questionnaire survey before and after training were compared to compare the level of professional skills and training satisfaction before and after training, and evaluated from two aspects of teaching and learning, and the non-conditional logistic regression analysis of related factors. [Results] Through training, the average score of professional skills of trainees increased from 64.58 to 85.71. There was significant difference in professional skills before and after training (t = 12.956 ~ 23.076, P <0.01). After the training, they had higher education level, higher titles, qualified doctors and higher professional skills in western medicine treatment than other groups (F = 2.956 ~ 7.546, P <0.05). Meanwhile, over 90% The trainees are satisfied with the training effect. The main influencing factors of the training effect were working unit (OR = 2.129, 95% CI 1.527-2.969), education level (OR = 2.607,95% CI 2.222-3.064), technical title (OR 2.525, 95% CI (OR = 3.182, 95% CI = 1.458 ~ 6.942) and practicing category (OR = 0.316, 95% CI = 0.163 ~ 0.615). [Conclusion] The training has achieved good results. The training mode and method are suitable for expanding popularization and application in rural areas.