论文部分内容阅读
目的通过对国内外国际疾病分类(ICD)研究文献进行聚类分析,对比国内外国际疾病分类论文研究热点的分布和异同。方法利用中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和美国国立医学图书馆的pubmed检索ICD文献,采用文献计量学和聚类分析方法分析。结果通过对ICD高频关键词聚类分析分别绘制树状图,总结得出了国内3个研究热点和国外4个研究热点。结论国内外ICD研究热点存在一致性和差异性,国内的ICD研究有待深入和扩展。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the similarities and differences of research hot spots in international and Chinese dissertations by analyzing the literature of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) both at home and abroad. Methods The ICD literature of CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) and pubmed by the National Library of Medicine was searched by using bibliometrics and cluster analysis. Results The dendrogram was drawn by cluster analysis of ICD high frequency keywords, and three hot research spots in China and four research hot spots in foreign countries were concluded. Conclusions There is consistency and difference in ICD research hotspots at home and abroad, and ICD research in China needs to be deepened and expanded.