本文针对日本学者广松涉提出的《德意志意识形态》特别是“费尔巴哈”章写作过程中的“恩格斯主导论”,从文献学考证与文本学解读相统一的视角进行了反驳。揭示了马克思和恩格斯在对待施蒂纳、以赫斯为代表的“真正的社会主义”、费尔巴哈评价上的差异,以及恩格斯在这三个问题上观点转变的“断裂性”同马克思观点演化的“连续性”的不同,确认了马克思在“费尔巴哈”章和整个《德意志意识形态》写作过程中的主导作用。 This essay aims at the “Engels Leading Theory” in the German Ideology, especially “Feuerbach”, written by Japanese scholar Komatsu Hiroshi, and refutes from the perspective of unification of philology and textology. Reveals Marx and Engels in Tretna, Hers as the representative of the “real socialism” Feuerbach evaluation differences, and Engels views on these three issues change “fracture” with Marx The difference of “continuity” in the evolution of view confirms the leading role of Marx in the writing of “Feuerbach” and the whole “Deutsche Ideology.”