论文部分内容阅读
“任务诱导投入”假设认为词汇的习得与加工时的投入量有关,投入量越大,词汇的记忆效果越好(Laufer and Hulstijn,2001),本实验通过六项不同的词汇学习任务来验证该假设。试验结果表明不同的投入量会对词汇即时记忆产生不同的促进作用,但投入量大的学习任务并不一定比投入量小的任务更好地协助词汇习得,同时投入量的三个因素需求、搜索、评估的作用并不等同。而六组不同的任务对词汇的延时记忆没有显著性差异,说明词汇的附带习得虽然和投入量有关,但同时也受到时间和频率对习得的影响。本研究结果将帮助我们反思投入量假设并更好地设计词汇任务类型。
“Assumption of Engagement ” Assume that vocabulary acquisition is related to input during processing. The greater the input, the better the memory of vocabulary (Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001). The experiment uses six different vocabulary learning tasks To verify this assumption. The test results show that different input volume will have different promotion effects on real-time memory of words, but the learning tasks with large input amount are not necessarily better than vocabulary input tasks, and the input of three factors demand Search, evaluation of the role is not the same. The six groups of different tasks on the vocabulary delay memory is not significantly different, indicating that the incidental vocabulary acquisition, though with the amount of investment, but also affected by the time and frequency of acquisition. The results of this study will help us to reflect the input assumptions and to better design vocabulary task types.