论文部分内容阅读
目的研究分析采用神经内镜手术和显微镜手术治疗垂体腺瘤的临床效果。方法 40例垂体腺瘤患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组20例。观察组采取神经内镜手术治疗,对照组采取显微镜手术治疗。对比分析两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果观察组患者手术时间显著多于对照组,住院时间以及术后并发症显著少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组肿瘤全切率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于垂体腺瘤患者采用神经内镜手术和显微手术均具有显著疗效,且各有利弊,而神经内镜手术的住院时间和并发症更少,促进患者恢复,值得临床推广运用。
Objective To study the clinical effect of endoscopic neurosurgery and microsurgical treatment of pituitary adenoma. Methods Forty patients with pituitary adenoma were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 20 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with neuroendoscopy and the control group with microsurgical treatment. Comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical effects. Results The operation time of the observation group was significantly more than that of the control group. The length of hospital stay and postoperative complications were significantly less than those of the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in tumor resection rate (P > 0.05). Conclusions There are significant curative effects in patients with pituitary adenomas by using endoscopic and microsurgical techniques, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. However, the length of hospital stay and complications of endoscopic neurosurgical operations is less and the recovery of patients is promoted, which is worthy of clinical application.