论文部分内容阅读
本校已连续三年招收文科基地班学生,办班的目的是培养文史哲方面的杰出人才,以作今后的骨干师资。初试语、数、外三门,均笔试,三分之一进入复试,以1∶1.2比例差额录取。复试为面试,由文史哲三系七八名教师负责,主要考察学生的知识面和读书感觉。应该说,各中学推荐的都是尖子,经过严格的初试已作了一番选择,但在面试中我们感到满意的优秀学生并不多,一般不超过十名。比较明显的情况是,学生在课程以外的阅读量太少,知识面仅限于规定的范围中,稍微超过一些就茫然无知。我们的提问采用随机的方式,包括古今中外、文史哲各
The school has enrolled students in the Liberal Arts Base for three consecutive years. The purpose of the class is to train outstanding talents in literature, history, and philosophy for future key teachers. The first trial language, number, and outside three were all written tests. One-third of them entered the retest and were admitted with a 1:1.2 ratio difference. The re-examination was an interview. The teachers from the Department of Literature, History, and Philosophy were in charge of the department’s knowledge and reading. It should be said that all secondary schools have recommended top-notch students. After a rigorous initial test, they have made some choices. However, there are not many excellent students who are satisfied with the interview. Generally, they do not exceed ten. The more obvious situation is that students have too few readings outside of the course and their knowledge is limited to the prescribed range. If they exceed a few points, they are ignorant. Our questions are given in a random manner, including ancient and modern Chinese, foreign languages, literature, history, and philosophy.