上课铃响了,徐振维老师走上讲台。 “同学们,大家好!”她推了一下眼镜。“今天和大家一起学习吴晗同志的议论文《谈骨气》。” 原以为徐老师会有一段精彩的开场白,先声夺人,让众多听课的老师一睹风采。不料,徐老师的开场白竟是那样直截了当,朴实无华:“议论文是一种摆事实、讲道理的文章,因此,我们在学习时一定要十分注意它摆了哪些事实、讲了什么道理。” 接着她板书了本文的教学目的:“用事实作论据来证明论点的正确”。令听课的人纳闷的是徐老师并不板书课题。她认为每上新课就板书课题,多少有点形式主义。她也没有把课本中规定的教学目“严 The class bell rang and teacher Xu Zhenwei walked onto the podium. ”Classmates, everyone!“ She pushed her glasses. ”Today we will study with Comrade Wu Yi’s argumentative essay “Talking about the bone.”“ Xu thought that Teacher Xu would have a wonderful opening speech and take the lead in order to let many teachers who listened to lectures feel glamorous. Unexpectedly, Mr. Xu’s opening remarks were as straightforward and unpretentious as possible: “Argumentation is an article that puts facts and reasoning. Therefore, we must be very careful about what facts and what it says when we study. ” She then wrote the paper’s purpose of teaching: “Factual arguments to prove the correct ”. What puzzled those who attended the lecture was that Teacher Xu was not the subject of board writing. She believes that each new class will have a bit of formalism on the subject of board writing. She also didn’t put the textbooks specified in the textbook “strictly”