通过对教育部《义务教育物理课程标准(2011年版)》(以下简称《修订稿》)与2001年颁布的《全日制义务教育物理课程标准(实验稿)》(以下简称《实验稿》)进行对照比较,笔者认为,《修订稿》在保持原整体框架结构和核心内容基本不变的基础上,增强了指导性、规范性、可操作性和可评价性。深入了解课标变化的具体内容及原因,有助于学校和教师更好地开展教育教学工作。一、对课标变化的认识和理解与《实验稿》相比,《修订稿》有了多处改变。“前言”、 Through the “compulsory education physical curriculum standard (2011 edition)” (hereinafter referred to as the “revised draft”) and the “full-time compulsory education physical curriculum standard (experimental draft)” (hereinafter referred to as “experimental draft”) promulgated in 2001 In comparison with the comparison, the author believes that the revised draft enhances guidance, normativity, operability and evaluability on the basis of keeping the original overall framework structure and core contents basically unchanged. A better understanding of the specific content and reason for the change of the curriculum standard will help schools and teachers to carry out better education and teaching work. First, understanding and understanding of the changes in the standard compared with the “experimental draft” compared to “revised draft” there are many changes. “Introduction ”,