论文部分内容阅读
20世纪中国大陆的哲学学科作为现代意义上的专业学术领域经历了复杂的演变过程。反观这一进程,其学科取向大致形成了三个主要的学术范式群:马克思主义哲学的中国化和与时俱进的开拓;中国传统哲学研究与创新;西方哲学的译介与研究。本文从西方哲学的视角出发,就三者在学术范式层面上的对话做了初步的反思。本文认为,西方哲学研究应当为当代马克思主义哲学的发展提供理论视角和学术方法的借鉴。而中国哲学研究在学术研究和创造范式上的重建工作以及中西哲学的对话课题所面临的基本问题,主要体现在学术语言、中国哲学问题意识与问题场域的重新构造上。无论是中国哲学研究还是西方哲学研究都应当首先回到自身的脉络中,梳理和考察自身的问题。
In the 20th century, the philosophy of Mainland China has undergone a complex evolution as a professional academic field in the modern sense. In contrast with this process, its disciplinary orientation formed roughly three major academic paradigms: the sinicization and advancement of Marxism in philosophy; the research and innovation of Chinese traditional philosophy; the translation and introduction of western philosophy. From the perspective of western philosophy, this article makes a preliminary reflection on the dialogue among the three in the academic paradigm. This paper argues that the study of western philosophy should provide a theoretical perspective and reference for the development of contemporary Marxist philosophy. However, the basic problems facing the reconstruc- tion of Chinese philosophical research on academic research and creation paradigms and the dialogues between Chinese and Western philosophies lie mainly in the reconstruction of the field of academic language and Chinese philosophical issues and problems. Both Chinese philosophy and Western philosophy should first go back to their own context, sort out and examine their own problems.