论文部分内容阅读
北京恒升公司诉用户王洪及两家媒体侵害名誉一案,在20世纪最后的日子里出现了结果:王洪及两家媒体败诉,恒升赢得了近百万元的赔偿。 消费者批评企业,企业把消费者告上法庭,这似乎是一起简单的民事经济案件;但问题在于,消费者批评的落脚点是在网上,因而,恒升公司把互联网推上了法庭。1999年12月15日,互联网输了,输给了一个不懂互联网的公司,而这家公司恰巧还在制造电脑。 无论从哪一个方面看,这桩案子都可以称得上中国互联网第一案。消费者权益保护是恒升案的焦点,但网络上的言论自由则是此案的内核。迅速发展的互联网以其有力之手,把原子世界的法律戳破了不
Beijing Hengsheng v. Wang Hong users and two media infringement honor case, the last days of the 20th century there was a result: Wang Hong and the two media lost, Hengsheng won nearly one million yuan in compensation. Consumers criticize businesses and businesses for bringing consumers to court. This seems to be a simple civil economic case. The problem, however, is that consumer criticism ends in the Internet. As a result, Hengsheng pushed the Internet to court. On December 15, 1999, the Internet was lost and lost to a company that did not know the internet, and the company happened to be still making computers. No matter from which aspect, this case can be regarded as the first case of China’s Internet. The protection of consumers’ rights and interests is the focus of Hengsheng case, but the freedom of speech on the Internet is the core of the case. The rapidly developing Internet, with its powerful hands, has punctured the laws of the atomic world