论文部分内容阅读
本文是对本刊 2 0 0 2年第 3期发表的刘瑞明《所谓〈聊斋小曲〉中非蒲松龄作品》一文的回应。作者认为 ,刘文对《聊斋小曲》附编中作品的考辨成果可喜 ,但歪曲了原整理者对这些作品的观点和定位 ;对其认作赝品的质量随意贬损 ,不切实际 ;其否定《聊斋小曲》正编曲作为真品的理由均不成立。本文对刘文这些方面的观点和论述作了反驳 ,并揭示了《聊斋小曲》附编与附录中另外 5种伪作的根底。
This article is a response to Liu Ruiming’s “So-called Works by Pu Songling in Central Africa” published in the 3rd issue of this journal in 2002. The author believes that Liu Wen is gratifying about the examination results of the works appearing in the “Liao Zhai Xiao Qu”, but distorts the viewpoints and positions of the original arrangers on these works; it is impractical to think of the quality of the imitations as derogatory; “Liao Zhai Xiao Qu” is the true theme of the music are not justified. This article refutes these views and discourses of Liu Wen, and reveals the foundation of the other five kinds of pseudo-works in the appendix and appendix of Liao Zhai Xiao Qu.