浦江清先生《论小说》一文从传统小说“古义”的角度——以《汉书·艺文志》为基础——对“笔记小说”进行了研究,认为《四库全书总目》小说家的分类有些问题,“《四库全书总目》的编者重新改订小说的意义时,他们认为小说只是记琐事、琐语、异闻的小书,把胡应麟的后面三类多半送到杂家类里面去了……所以四库书目的编者实立于尴尬的地位,于古于今,两失其依据,代表了几位18世纪的学者对于小说的观念”1。其实四 From the perspective of traditional novels “ancient righteousness ”, Pujiang Qing’s article “On novels” - based on “Han Yi Yi Wen Zhi” - studies “” notes novel “The classification of novelists has some problems.” When editors of the “Sikuquanshu Zongmu” re-defined the significance of the novel, they considered the novel as a mere booklet of trifles, trivialities, and different customs. Most of the latter three were sent by Hu Yinglin To the miscellaneous class which went ... ... Therefore, the editor of the Siku Bibliography was established in an awkward position, in ancient and modern, both lost its basis, on behalf of a number of 18th century scholars on the concept of novel In fact, four