论文部分内容阅读
淡化标准是淡化理论的核心,决定着权利人的权利范围,也体现了竞争者的行为界限。然而淡化标准在实际淡化和淡化可能性之间的迷失,严重地损害了法律的可预见性和司法裁判的一致性。事实上,这两种标准并非互相排斥,二者的合理结合更利于利益平衡。根据商标的显著性和淡化行为的危害后果来确定淡化的证明标准,或者可以避免两种标准单独适用的种种弊端,也应当为立法所倡。
Desalination standard is the core of desalination theory, determines the rights of rights holders, but also reflects the boundaries of competitors. However, the loss of dilution between the actual desalination and the desalination is seriously undermined the predictability of law and the consistency of judicial adjudication. In fact, these two standards are not mutually exclusive, and the reasonable combination of the two is more conducive to the balance of interests. According to the saliency of the trademark and the destructive effect of desalination to determine the proof standard of desalination, or can avoid the disadvantages of the two standards alone, it should be advocated by legislation.