论文部分内容阅读
与刘易斯·芒福德在《历史名城》(The City in History)中,始终偏爱低清晰度的、结构松散的城市类似。在本期的“独立空间”项目中,松散的城市之声也是连接着不同空间结构的、低清晰度的暗语。在上期组织“故乡缺口”的主题时,我们希望以一种比较冷硬、具有强迫感的视角,将那些分散在不同城市和头脑中空间的“独立性”强化出来,作为一种异质性的存在与其所在的城市产生着“对抗”——用不被大众所认可的艺术方式切开故乡慵懒文化的伤口。而随着专题的推进,这些非中心城市“散漫”的生长轨迹,还是将那种一厢情愿式的强硬姿态,带回到“松散”和“低清晰度”的概念中来。
And Lewis Mumford, in The City in History, has always favored low-resolution, loosely-structured cities. In this issue of “The Independent Space,” the loose voice of the city is also a low-resolution allegory linking different spatial structures. In organizing the theme of “home gap” in the last issue, we hope to strengthen those “independence ” scattered in different cities and mind spaces in a rather cold and obsessive perspective as a The existence of heterogeneity creates a “confrontation” with the city in which it is located - cutting the wounds of homeless lazy culture in ways that are not recognized by the public. With the advance of the topic, the growth trajectories of these non-central cities and the hard-line attitude of wishful thinking are brought back to the concepts of “looseness” and “low-definitionness” .