论文部分内容阅读
目的研究踝关节骨折患者采用不同的内固定方式治疗的临床效果。方法抽选2013年6月~2014年6月骨科收治的52例踝关节骨折患者进行研究，根据内固定治疗方式的不同将其分为两组，对照组26例行切开复位内固定治疗，研究组26例行闭合复位内固定治疗；对比总结两组临床治疗效果。结果研究组踝关节功能恢复优良率高于对照组，并发症率低于对照组，且术后疼痛轻微，与对照组相比，<0.05，差异显著。结论切开复位内固定治疗与闭合复位内固定治疗相比对患者创伤小，并发症少，有效恢复踝关节功能，提高临床治愈率。“,”Objective To study the ankle fractures were treated with dif erent clinical results of treatment within a fixed manner. Methods The lot ery from 6 months to June 2014 were studied in 2013 52 cases of ankle fractures in patients treated orthopedics, internal fixation depending on the way wil be divided into two groups, 26 cases open reduction and internal fixation , within the study group 26 cases closed fixation;comparative summary of two clinical ef ect. Results The study group good ankle function recovery rate was higher complication rate than the control group, and postoperative pain slightly, compared with the control group, <0.05, significant dif erence. Conclusion Open reduction and internal fixation with closed reduction and internal fixation compared to patients less trauma, fewer complications, ef ectively restore ankle joint function, improve the clinical cure rate.