有同志在报纸上著文,说某单位树立了先进的人才观,已经在干部的使用、提拔中打破了”领导来自基层,干部来自工人”的片面的”认识。这使人感到吃惊。在实行任命制的情况下,本来什么原则都不一定得到完全的落实,因为任命制中人为的因素太大。但是,有一个好的原则,毕竟可以起到一定的规范作用。”干部来自工人”,可能有些过时,如今从理论上讲,我们企业已经打破了干部、工人的界限,这种情况下再说”干部来自工人”就显得有点落后了,也没有什么实际意义了,所以不说也罢。可是”领导来自基层”却没有过时,这是一个很好的原则。所谓领导,心然要带队伍,要管理众人的事,要带领众人去办事。不像科学家、工程师、作家只需埋头在业务中,即使管人也数量不大,而且比较简单。只要稍有政治观念的人都会明白:作为领导干部,带队伍的经验是必不可少的。没有 Some comrades in the newspaper said that a unit has established an advanced concept of talent and has surprised people by breaking the “one-sided” awareness of “leadership from the grass roots and cadres from workers” in the use and promotion of cadres. In the case of a system of appointments, what principles are not necessarily fully implemented because the man-made factors in appointment systems are too large. However, there is a good principle which can, after all, play a normative role. “Cadres from workers” It may be somewhat outdated. Nowadays, in theory, our enterprises have already broken the line between cadres and workers. In this case, it seems that there is no practical significance to say that “cadres are coming from workers”. However, it is a very good principle that “leaders from the grassroots level” should not be outdated, and that the so-called leadership must take the lead in managing the affairs of all people and should lead the people in doing things. Unlike scientists, engineers and writers, Even in the business, the number of managers is small and relatively simple, as long as people with some political views understand that as a leading cadre, the experience of leading a team is inevitable Of no