读郝国忱的剧本,许多论者都在作者的“心路历程”与其每一部作品的“深刻内涵”所构成的坐标系上,读出了一条时缓时陡的上升曲线,似乎二者间的关系已非常清楚,无须赘述了。然而对此,我却不时困惑,我感到作者与作品的关系,并非那么一目了然,其中有许多地方是朦胧的,令人深思而不得其解的。我认为,研究文学艺术,不一定非得机械地将创作主体与艺术主体进行一对一的解析,因 Reading Hao Guo-chen’s script, many of the commentators read a steep rise-time curve in the coordinates of the author’s “journey of the mind” and the “profound connotation” of each of his works, The relationship is very clear, need not go into details. However, from time to time, I am confused. I feel that the relationship between the author and the works is not so clear at all. Many of them are obscure and thought-provoking. In my opinion, the study of literature and art does not necessarily have to mechanically analyze the creative subject and the artistic subject one by one because