论文部分内容阅读
博弈双方“实力”的悬殊,以及相关法律的空白,是导致“原始股”维权难的主要原因。福建省福州市中级人民法院日前对一起非法经营案件做出终审判决,维持鼓楼区法院一审判决,以非法经营罪分别判处福州成高投资顾问有限公司股东詹吉东、陈宝玉有期徒刑4年和3年6个月,司法机关扣押的40万元赃款按比例发还34名受害者。法律专家指出,这意味着34名受害者只能获得1/10的补偿,而由于法律规定缺失,作为“原始股”发行方的四川国虹信息产业股份有限公司和为“原始股”销售“合法性”“背书”的托管中心未受到追究,这一现象在当前“原始股”受害者维权案件中具有普遍性。
The disparity between the two sides of the game and the strength of the game, as well as the blank of the relevant laws, are the main reasons leading to the difficulty of safeguarding the rights of the original shares. Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Fujian Province recently made a final judgment on an illegal business case and upheld the judgment of the first instance of the court of Gulou District and sentenced Zhan Jidong and Chen Baoyu, the shareholders of Fuzhou Chenggao Investment Advisory Co., Ltd. to 4 years and 3 years respectively In the past six months, 34 victims stolen from the judiciary dispatched a pro rata rate of 400,000 yuan. Legal experts point out that this means that 34 victims can only get one-tenth of the compensation, and due to the lack of laws and regulations, as the “original” issuers of Sichuan Guohong Information Industry Co., Ltd. and “original shares ”Sales “ legality ”“ endorsement ”hosting center has not been held accountable, this phenomenon in the current “ original unit ”victim’s rights protection case has the universality.