论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究并对比腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术、经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术两种术法的疗效差异。方法:择取2011年12月到2016年12月期间由笔者所在医院收治的150例子宫肌瘤患者,按照患者所使用的术法将其分为两组,分别为:使用腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的75例研究组患者与使用经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的75例对照组患者。比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果:研究组总有效率为97.33%(73/75),对照组总有效率为86.67%(65/75),研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相较于经腹剔除术,腹腔镜剔除术对子宫肌瘤疗效更强。
Objective: To explore and compare the curative effects of laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy. Methods: Choose 150 patients with uterine fibroids admitted to the hospital from December 2011 to December 2016. The patients were divided into two groups according to the operation method used: laparoscopic uterine fibroids 75 patients in the resection group and 75 patients in the control group who underwent abdominal myomectomy. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: The total effective rate was 97.33% (73/75) in the study group and 86.67% (65/75) in the control group, which was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with transabdominal resection, laparoscopic resection of uterine fibroids more effective.