论文部分内容阅读
目的观察医院感染化学监测效果差异性。方法采用进口腔体测试装置布放化学指示卡方法,对压力蒸汽灭菌器内不同部位监测结果进行分析。结果试验组腔体测试装置内化学指示卡监测共60次,出现2次变色不合格,合格率为96.67%。对照组灭菌物品包内的指示卡监测300次,出现17次变色不合格,合格率为94.33%。经统计学分析,2组监测结果无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论采用特制腔体测试装置布放排气口附近的1点监测与包内指示卡5点布放监测结果无明显差别,每组都有变色不合格情况出现,且出现的机率相近。
Objective To observe the difference of the effect of chemical monitoring in hospital infection. Methods The method of placing chemical indicator in the inlet cavity test device was used to analyze the monitoring results of different parts in the pressure steam sterilizer. Results In the chamber of the test group, chemical indicator cards were monitored for 60 times in total. Two times of discoloration failed and the pass rate was 96.67%. In the control group, the indicator card in the sterilization package was monitored for 300 times, 17 times of discoloration failed and the pass rate was 94.33%. After statistical analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusions There is no significant difference between the monitoring results of 1 point monitoring near the exhaust port of the special chamber test device and the 5-point monitoring of the indicator card in the package. Each group has discoloration unqualified cases, and the probability of occurrence is similar.