论文部分内容阅读
做思想政治工作和搞经济建设一样,是要讲究效益的,也是能够实现效益的.问题是,有些单位仅以经济效益论英雄,论成败,把思想政治工作和经济建设两个不同范畴用一个指标去套,相提并论,就有失评判的客观标准,有欠公允.这是因为,虽然思想政治工作与经济工作都要实现效益这一目的是一致的,但两者实现效益的手段、途径和时间是不同的.在实现效益的手段上,经济工作大多是钱、物等硬件投入;在实现效益的途径上,经济工作是直接投入产出,而思想工作是通过工作对象间接地表现出来;在实现效益的时间上,经济工作可立竿见影,而思想政治工作的效益由于需要转化的过程,则需要一定的时日.
The same is true for doing ideological and political work and engaging in economic construction. The problem is that some units use only the economic efficiency to explain their heroes and success or failure. They use one for each of the two categories of ideological and political work and economic construction There are unfair reasons for the objective criteria of disqualification when the indicators are delineated and compared with each other, because although the ideological and political work is consistent with the goal of realizing economic benefits, both the means and the ways of realizing the benefits of the two Time is different.With regard to the means of realizing the benefits, most economic work is the investment of hardware such as money and goods. In terms of realizing the benefits, the economic work is directly invested in output while the ideological work is indirectly manifested through the work objects. Economic work can be immediate at a time when efficiency is achieved, and the benefits of ideological and political work require some time because of the process of conversion.