在目前的城乡反贫困战略中,要处理好“救急”和“救贫”的关系。“救急”属于社会救济的范畴,“救贫”则属于最低生活保障的范畴。我个人认为在政府的反贫困战略中,要以“救急”为主,“救贫”为辅。之所以持这样的观点是因为,如果政府以“救贫”为主,提高最低生活保障线,会给财政造成巨大负担。这方面以往发达国家有过不少经验教训,不少国家甚至因此出现财政危机。如果我国在未来提高最低生活保障线,政府只能是加税,或是多发票子。税加重了,经济发展的动力会下降,新增的就业机会就会减少,失业 In the current urban and rural anti-poverty strategy, we must handle the relationship between “emergency” and “saving the poor”. “Rescue ” belongs to the category of social relief, and “saving the poor” belongs to the category of minimum living allowance. I personally think that in the anti-poverty strategy of the government, we should rely mainly on “emergency” and “aid the poor”. The reason why we hold this view is that if the government regards “helping the poor” as the mainstay and raising the minimum living security line, it will have a tremendous financial burden on the government. In this regard, there have been many experiences and lessons learned by developed countries in the past and many countries even have a financial crisis. If our country increases the minimum living standard in the future, the government can only increase taxes or issue more coupons. As the tax increases, the motivation for economic development will decline, new job opportunities will be reduced and unemployment will be lost