在20世纪五六十年代的中印边界争端中,印度政府认为,1684年条约和1842年条约是其主张的中印边界西段东半部分(西藏—拉达克边界)的条约根据。但中国政府认为这两个条约并不能成为这段边界合法有效的条约根据。中国政府的主张是有事实依据的,而印度政府的观点则是无法成立的。 During the Sino-Indian border dispute in the 1950s and 1960s, the Indian government considered the 1684 and 1842 treaties as the basis for the treaty’s treaty on the eastern half of the western section of the Sino-Indian border (Tibet-Ladakh border). However, the Chinese government does not think these two treaties can serve as the basis for a legally valid treaty on this part of the border. The Chinese government’s position is based on factual evidence, while the Indian government’s view is untenable.