论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨临床路径健康教育干预对急性肾盂肾炎的作用。方法:将68例我院收治的急性肾盂肾炎患者,随机分为观察组和对照组各34例。两组患者给予相同的治疗方法,对照组患者给予常规护理措施,观察组患者给予临床路径健康教育干预措施。结果:两组患者的临床疗效无明显差异,观察组患者的护理满意度、健康教育知识的知晓率均明显高于对照组患者(P<0.05);平均住院时间明显短于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论:临床路径健康教育干预可以有效的提高患者对护理的满意度,对健康知识的了解程度,加快患者的恢复,值得临床推广。
Objective: To explore the effect of clinical path health education intervention on acute pyelonephritis. Methods: A total of 68 patients with acute pyelonephritis treated in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 34 cases each. Two groups of patients given the same treatment, the control group of patients given routine care, observation group patients given clinical pathways of health education interventions. Results: There was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy between the two groups. The nursing satisfaction and the awareness of health education in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P <0.05), and the average length of stay was significantly shorter than that in the control group <0.05). Conclusion: Clinical pathway health education intervention can effectively improve patient satisfaction with nursing, understanding of health knowledge and speed up the recovery of patients, it is worth clinical promotion.