我将要讨论的有关维特根斯坦现象学的这个疑难,看上去只是历史问题。它涉及到最近出版的一部他的遗著《哲学评论》。这个疑难的来源在于,“现象学”一词在这里首次明确而又反复地出现在已出版的维氏著作中。这个还没有引起人们注意的事实,它的意义和重要性何在?由于去请教维氏本人已为时过晚,因而不可能结论性地解答这一问题。但这个令人气馁的事实并非是回避这个问题的 The problem I have to discuss about Wittgenstein’s phenomenology seems to be a historical one. It relates to one of his most recent Philosophical Reviews, which was published recently. The source of this difficulty is that for the first time, the term “phenomenology” is clearly and repeatedly appearing in published Vickers writings. What is the significance and importance of this fact, which has yet to attract the attention of people? It is impossible to conclusively answer this question because it is too late to consult Vickers himself. But this discouraging fact is not to sidestep this issue