论文部分内容阅读
本文提出了解读凯尔森基础规范理论的另一种角度,即从凯尔森法与国家的同一性出发,不仅考虑基础规范对法律体系的功能,且同时兼顾基础规范对实现国家合法化的意义两个角度,在此基点上论证基础规范真正涵义应为“国家机关的行为应当符合法律秩序”。进而从对“法治”之基础规范的不同解释之对比中,引出名义法治观、形式法治观和目的法治观三种不同法治观,并分析其各自的实践后果,进而主张唯有目的法治观才能达至一个民族真正的政治成熟。
This article puts forward another point of view to interpret Kelsen’s basic normative theory. That is, starting from the identity of Kelsen’s law and the state, we not only consider the function of the basic norms on the legal system, but also give consideration to the fundamental norms to the legalization of the state The meaning of two angles, on the basis of which the basic norms of justification should be “State organs should act in accordance with the law ”. From the comparison of different interpretations of the basic norms of “rule by law ”, we draw out three different views on the rule of law from the notion of nominal rule of law, the concept of form and the concept of rule of law and the concept of the rule of law, and then analyze their respective practical consequences, The concept can achieve the true political maturity of a nation.