尧舜“禅让”是中国远古五帝时代关于王权继承制的两则传说,自春秋战国开始,各时代学派名家即对其延伸出的禅让制度进行了大量的研究,并且分门别派,形成了禅让学说。本文针对当今学界关于尧舜禅让与民主相对比的命题,在分析禅让与民主本质的基础上,从血缘关系与政治平等、公众意志与个人意志两个方面进行分析比较,得出尧舜禅让与民主背道而驰的论点。 Yao and Shun “Zen allow ” is the two legends about the succession system of monarchy in the ancient Five Emperors Era in China. Since the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, masters of various schools of thought have carried out a great deal of research on the system of the Zen Buddhism extended from them, and have been divided into groups to form Zen doctrine. Based on the analysis of the nature of Zen Buddhism and democracy, this paper analyzes and compares the two aspects of kinship and political equality, public will and personal will, and draws a conclusion that Yao, Shun and Zen go against democracy Argument.