仲裁,与和解、调解、诉讼一起,共同构成多元化纠纷解决体系,因其融合了调解的任意性和诉讼的强制性,所以成为人们十分青睐的化解矛盾的方式之一。但自1995年《仲裁法》实行以来,仲裁的实施状况并不乐观。仲裁机构行政化、仲裁裁决法律化和仲裁程序诉讼化成为颇受诟病的三大问题。本文主要以北京、上海、广州、武汉四地的仲裁委员会仲裁规则为依托,以第三个问题为重点展开论述。 Arbitration, together with reconciliation, conciliation and litigation, constitute a system of dispute resolution. As it integrates the arbitrariness of arbitration and the compulsory litigation, it becomes one of the most popular ways to resolve conflicts. However, since the implementation of the Arbitration Law in 1995, the status of arbitration has not been optimistic. The administration of arbitration institutions, the legalization of arbitral awards and the litigation of arbitration proceedings have become the three major issues that have been criticized. This article mainly relies on the Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Commission in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Wuhan, and focuses on the third issue.