论文部分内容阅读
我国的审判监督制度规定：各级人民法院院长对本院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定如发现确有错误，应当提交审判委员会决定是否再审；最高人民法院对地方各级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定，上级人民法院对下级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定，如果发现确有错误的，有权提审或指令下级人民法院再审。由此我们可以看出我国启动审判监督程序的再审案件其管辖法院是不确定的，既可能是由原审人民法院上级人民法院管辖，也可能是由原审人民法院管辖，实行的是多头管辖原则。笔者认为这样的规定不妥，再审案件应由原审人民法院的上级人民法院管辖，理由如下：
The system of trial supervision in our country stipulates that the judgments of the people’s courts at all levels on the legal validity of the courts have been ruled that, if found to be in error, they shall be submitted to the judicial committee for decision on whether or not to retrial; the Supreme People’s Court has already taken legal action against the people’s courts at various levels If the court finds that there is a mistake, it has the right to put forward a trial order or order a lower people’s court to retry the case. From this, we can see that the retrial cases in our country which start the procedure of trial supervision are not certain. The court may be not only under the jurisdiction of the people’s court at the higher level but also at the people’s court of the first instance. The principle of long jurisdiction is implemented. The author thinks that such a regulation is not proper and the case for retrial should be governed by the higher people’s court of the people’s court of the original trial for the following reasons: