论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨凉膈散联合西药治疗火热炽盛型口腔炎患者疗效及复发情况。方法:68例患者根据随机数字表法随机分为观察组和对照组各34例。对照组采用西药治疗,观察组在对照组基础上结合凉膈散治疗。两组疗程均为7 d。对比分析两组疗效结束后疗效、平均起效时间和治愈时间、治疗前后中医症状积分、复发率及不良反应。结果:观察组总有效率(97.06%)显著高于对照组(76.47%),且具有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组平均起效时间及治愈时间均显著快于对照组,且具有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组治疗后症状积分显著低于对照组,且具有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组复发率显著低于对照组,且具有统计学差异(P<0.05);治疗过程中两组患者均未发生明显不良反应。结论:凉膈散联合西药治疗火热炽盛型口腔炎患者疗效显著,可明显改善患者临床症状,不良反应少,且复发率低,具有重要临床研究意义。
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and recurrence of Liangge Powder combined with western medicine in the treatment of fiery and stomatitis patients. Methods: Sixty-eight patients were randomly divided into observation group (34 cases) and control group (34 cases) according to the random number table method. The control group was treated with western medicine. The observation group was treated with Liangge San on the basis of the control group. The two courses of treatment were 7 d. The curative effect, mean onset time and cure time of the two groups were compared and analyzed. The symptom score, recurrence rate and adverse reactions before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: The total effective rate (97.06%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (76.47%), with statistical significance (P <0.05). The mean effective time and the cure time in the observation group were significantly faster than those in the control group (P <0.05). The symptom scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P <0.05), and the recurrence rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). No significant adverse reactions occurred in both groups during the course of treatment. Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of Liangge Powder combined with Western medicine on patients with hot flaming stomatitis is significant, which can significantly improve the clinical symptoms, fewer adverse reactions and low recurrence rate, which is of great clinical significance.