论文部分内容阅读
通过两个实例对比了吸水剂泥团裹根造林与一般国营林场常规造林的成本.结果表明,前者的成本高于后者的成本,但吸水剂造林可以增大造林成功的把握,减少补植工作量或重造次数,相对地降低了造林成本.如按每栽活1株苗木支出的费用计算,因吸水剂造林可以提高造林成活率,增强单位面积上的存活株数,故其成本大多数情况下要低些,特别是在立地条件不良的地方更明显.
Through two examples, the cost of water-absorbing agent mud-wrap afforestation and general afforestation of state-owned forest farms was compared.The results show that the cost of the former is higher than that of the latter, but afforestation with water-absorbing agent can increase the success of afforestation and reduce planting Workload or rebuild the number of times, relative to reduce the cost of afforestation.According to the cost per plant live seedlings expenditure calculation, because of water-absorbing agent afforestation can increase the survival rate of afforestation and increase the number of survivors per unit area, so the cost of most The situation is lower, especially in the poor site conditions more obvious.