论文部分内容阅读
立法平等应当是形式平等与实质平等的结合。《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第29条和《国务院关于安置老弱病残干部的暂行办法》第4条之规定并不违反平等原则,而恰恰体现了对实质平等的追求。二者的不足之处在于忽视了立法平等的相对性和现实问题的复杂性,从而有可能导致在个案中出现结果的不平等。
Legislative equality should be a combination of formal equality and substantive equality. Article 29 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Some Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases and Article 4 of the Interim Measures of the State Council on Resettling the Sick and Handicapped Cadres do not violate the principle of equality but precisely reflect the The pursuit of substantive equality. The inadequacies of the two lie in ignoring the relative equality of legislation and the complexity of practical problems, which may lead to the inequality of results in individual cases.