“共识”在当下的社会,已经越来越成为奢侈品了,在任何问题上,都可以爆发没完没了的口水战。其实,众议纷纭是社会应有的常态,倒不必忧心忡忡。只要没有公权力出来拉偏架,争论并不可怕。在争论历史问题时,出现频率最高的词是“误读”。相对于捏造历史,恶搞历史,“误读”是一个比较温和的词汇。前者是立场问题,后者是水平问题。比如有关秦桧与岳飞谁是忠臣的争论,我读吕思勉先生的《自修适用白 “Consensus ” in the present society, has become more and more a luxury, and on any issue, there can be endless war of words and wars. In fact, various public opinions are a normal part of the society and need not be worrisome. As long as there is no public authority to pull out of position, the debate is not terrible. When arguing about history, the word that appears most frequently is “misreading”. Relative to the fabricated history, spoof history, “misread ” is a relatively gentle vocabulary. The former is a position issue, the latter is a level issue. For example, Qin Hui and Yue Fei who are loyalists debate, I read Mr. Lu Simian’s "self-applied white