论文部分内容阅读
1引言贵刊2012年第8期刊登了题为“基于Lade-Duncan和SMP两种强度准则的岩石残余应力研究[1]”的文章(以下称为“原文”)。原文中将中主应力考虑到岩石的峰后本构模型中,其研究内容具有较好的创新与研究意义。但是笔者认为,原文在研究时采用的一些方法与结论并不可信。故此,提出以下问题与其他学者进行探讨。
1 INTRODUCTION Your publication No. 8, 2012 has published an article titled “Residual Stresses of Rock Based on Lade-Duncan and SMP Intensity Criteria [1]” (hereafter referred to as the “original”). In the original text, the middle principal stress is taken into account in the post-peak constitutive model of rock, and its research content has a good innovation and research significance. However, in my opinion, some of the methods and conclusions adopted in the original research are not credible. Therefore, the following questions are proposed to be discussed with other scholars.