论文部分内容阅读
目的比较开腹和腹腔镜进行直肠癌根治术的临床疗效。方法选取我院进行的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的30例患者和开腹直肠癌根治术的96例患者,并对患者在术中、术后的情况进行比较。结果开腹组和腹腔镜组患者的手术时间分别为(142.7±33.6)min和(195.3±45.2)min,两组数据有显著性差异(P<0.01),而腹腔镜组后10例患者的手术时间则无显著性差异(P>0.05)。另外,两组患者的肠道功能恢复时间有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论开腹手术与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术相比,疗效基本相同,但腹腔镜直肠癌根治术就手术的出血量、恢复时间等方面都较优于开腹手术。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of open and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods A total of 30 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer and 96 patients undergoing radical resection of rectal cancer were selected in our hospital. The patients were compared between intraoperative and postoperative conditions. Results The operative time of patients in laparotomy group and laparoscopic group were (142.7±33.6) min and (195.3±45.2) min, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01), while in the laparoscopic group, the operative time was 10 patients. There was no significant difference in operation time (P>0.05). In addition, there was a significant difference in the recovery time of intestinal function between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer, open surgery has the same efficacy, but laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer is superior to open surgery in terms of blood loss and recovery time.