全日制义务教育《语文课程标准》的语言本应该规范准确,堪为“标准”,但事实上却存在着许多问题。本文从全日制义务教育《语文课程标准(实验稿)》(北京师范大学出版社,2001年7月版)有问题的语句中选出十例评析,希望引起重视,以维护汉语的严肃性、纯洁性和规范性。例一:九年义务 The language of the “Chinese Curriculum Standards” for full-time compulsory education should be standardized and can be considered as a “standard”, but in fact there are many problems. This article selects ten cases from the problematic sentences in the Full-time Compulsory Education “Chinese Language Curriculum Standards (Experimental Draft)” (Beijing Normal University Press, July 2001 edition), hoping to pay attention to the importance of maintaining the seriousness of Chinese. Purity and normative. Example 1: Nine-year obligations